The first two chapters of
Essential Linguistics cover first, second and written language theories. According to an array of theories including Krashens theory on second language acquistion, which is probably the most well known. It encompasses five hypotheses. These include learning/acquistion, monitor, affective filter, input and natural order.
1) learning /acquistion: learning is studying vocabulary and rules. Acqusition is unconscious can develop in conversation and other language activities.
2) monitor: focusing on how a sentence was said rather than what you actually said.
3)affective filter: certain factors can inhibit learning. These could include lack of motivation, a student's attitude in the class or even outside noise that distracts the student.
4)input: i + 1 if a student is recieving something that is too advanced they will not learn anything. However, if it is just above their understanding they can use social cues and metalinguistic knowledge understand a sentence or conversation.
5) natural order: some aspects of langauge appear before others do.
Developmental Psychology
- language and cognition develop seperately but related
- most children develop langauge, do rapidly without instruction (language different from other learning
Sociology, Anthropology, Education
- communicative competence: the knowledge of what to say to and under what circumstances
- invention and convention: students will invent words and phrases to express themselves. However each context in which the students live as different conventions or ways of using language. I.e. school more formal than at home, but may not always be the case.
Linguistics
- Universal Grammar: humans are born with the basic structures of every langauge in the brain.
- Generative grammar: two parts surface structure ( what we say or write) and deep structure ( what is meant). Sentences can be ambiguous because words have multiple meanings. Example: She's a cougar. Could mean she likes to date younger men or that she really is a furry animal with whiskers.
Looking back at my first, second and written language experience. Most of it was primarily conducted in the learning camp. Not until i got to college did i really experience acquisition teaching techniques in my second language. The positives of using the acquisition approach definitely outweigh the negatives. Students can relate to the topics easier because it is built toward communcative competence. They do not have to worry about the constant drilling. Lastly they do not have to fear being corrected repeatedly, which is something i personally have experienced and it did inhibit my learning. I was afraid to participate in class, and in a language classroom this is the worst thing that could happen because you need students to participate to be successful.